Utweets
BREAKING NEWS| MEET THE WOMAN WHO FINALLY OPENS UP ON Sl33PING WITH 100 MEN IN ONE DAY |SEE THE FULL V!DEO BY CLICKING THIS LINK.There is growing uncertainty at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) as both the embattled former chairman, Danladi Umar, and his newly appointed successor, Mainasara Kogo, claim leadership over the tribunal. ...READ THE FULL STORY FROM SOURCE ...READ THE FULL STORY FROM SOURCE
This confusion has caused significant disruption within the tribunal, with no clear direction on who is in charge, despite both individuals visiting the tribunal and interacting with staff.
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu appointed Kogo as the new CCT chairman on July 13, 2024, the same day Omolola Oloworaran was named Director-General of the National Pension Commission (PenCom). However, the ongoing controversy surrounding Umar’s removal has created a leadership vacuum at the tribunal, slowing down its operations. Despite this, several corruption cases involving public servants continue to be processed, and some cases are still set for trial or arraignment.
Staff members at the tribunal, speaking on condition of anonymity, have expressed confusion over who they should report to. Both Umar and Kogo have addressed the staff, but without any official communication or directives, many employees are left uncertain. One tribunal staff member, in an interview with Daily Trust, stated: “We are civil servants, and we can work with whoever comes, but we haven’t received any formal notification about the changes. We are still awaiting clear instructions about who to follow.”
The staff member went on to note the lack of clarity regarding the proper procedures for appointing and removing the CCT chairman. According to the official process, the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC) must screen any appointee, the National Judicial Council (NJC) must provide recommendations, and then the president’s appointment must be confirmed by the Senate. Without this formal process, it remains unclear who holds legitimate authority at the tribunal.BREAKING NEWS| MEET THE WOMAN WHO FINALLY OPENS UP ON Sl33PING WITH 100 MEN IN ONE DAY |SEE THE FULL V!DEO BY CLICKING THIS LINK.
The absence of clear leadership has caused delays in addressing ongoing cases. Another tribunal official shared that with the judiciary now on holiday, outstanding cases have been adjourned until January, further stalling progress. “He came today, but left without any resolutions. The entire judiciary is now on holiday, so we’ve decided to push all the outstanding cases into the new year,” the official stated.
Meanwhile, there is growing criticism over Umar’s continued visits to the tribunal. A former staff member questioned the legality of his actions, asking: “Why is he still coming to work and attempting to sign documents or approve payments to contractors? He is no longer the chairman, and his presence here is illegal.”
Following Umar’s removal, President Tinubu’s decision was endorsed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives on November 20 and 26, 2024, respectively. The legislative bodies cited allegations of misconduct and corruption as the basis for their resolution, which was passed under the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution and the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act, 2004.
These legal provisions state that the removal of a CCT chairman requires the approval of two-thirds of each house of the National Assembly, and it must be supported by an address from the president. The address must cite reasons such as misconduct, inability to discharge duties, or violation of the Code of Conduct. However, the legal challenges over Umar’s removal remain unresolved, as a group of civil society organizations, including the Community Rescue Initiative, Toro Concerned Citizens, and Relief Foundation, have filed a suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja. The suit argues that the resolutions from both the Senate and the House of Representatives are unconstitutional and should be nullified.
The ongoing legal battles have raised concerns about the constitutional validity of both Umar’s removal and Kogo’s appointment. Legal experts have pointed out several issues with the process. Sunusi Musa (SAN), a senior lawyer, argued that the president did not follow the proper legal process to remove Umar. According to him, the constitution mandates that both houses of the National Assembly must pass a resolution by a two-thirds majority to support the president’s action. Musa also questioned Kogo’s authority, pointing out that Kogo had not been properly appointed or inaugurated by the NJC, making his visits to the tribunal legally questionable. “Where is he getting the power to visit the tribunal if he hasn’t been inaugurated as the chairman?” Musa asked.
Dayo Akinlaja (SAN), another prominent lawyer, echoed similar concerns, noting that Kogo’s appointment remains unofficial without an official letter of appointment. “Without an official letter of appointment, the removal cannot be considered valid, and it leaves room for legal challenges,” Akinlaja explained.
Furthermore, Haroun Eze, Esq, pointed to the procedural flaws in Umar’s removal, stating that the proper channels had not been followed. “The removal didn’t follow the required procedure for removing a CCT chairman,” Eze noted, suggesting that the Attorney General of the Federation should have initiated formal proceedings for misconduct against Umar, providing a legal foundation for the National Assembly’s actions.BREAKING NEWS| MEET THE WOMAN WHO FINALLY OPENS UP ON Sl33PING WITH 100 MEN IN ONE DAY |SEE THE FULL V!DEO BY CLICKING THIS LINK.
In conclusion, the situation at the CCT remains in limbo, with both legal and procedural uncertainties complicating the leadership transition. As the legal challenges progress, the fate of the tribunal and its ongoing cases hangs in the balance, while calls for clearer governance and adherence to due process continue to grow.…Read -T.he.Full_Article.Here.
